Trump and the ETs
Trump and the ETS Mental illness is not new, and it likely will be around for a long time. UFOs are just a manifestation of mental illness. -The rumored UFO briefer to Donald Trump Hi Julia. My intention was limited to either cause Grant to stop posting fake stories about me that he extracts (painfully) from Dan Smith or give his readers enough information so they could understand that he is dissembling. - The rumored UFO briefer to Donald Trump They may be anticipating some action. I have been waiting for President-Elect Trump to take office before taking more serious actions. He is very "pro-disclosure" and very anti "disinformation." -Dr. Ronald Pandolfi, who ran the UFO weird desk at the CIA in January 2017 We have a phenomenology problem. -Ron Pandolfi, answering Dan Smith's question about UFOs in 1991 Before the 2016 election, it appeared that Hillary Clinton was going to attempt to end UFO secrecy after she promised to get to the bottom of the UFO story. Her claims were supported by John Podesta, her campaign manager and former Chief of Staff to President Obama. As soon as Hillary lost, researchers who were aware of the Clinton disclosure plan figured that we would return to the dark world of UFO denials by Washington officials. Then, just two weeks before Trump took office, there was a message posted on the Facebook page of Robert Collins, a former physicist at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Collins had been a long-time friend of Ron Pandolfi and had gotten a job interview at the CIA with Pandolfi's help. He had received the message from Pandolfi, who was identified in the 1990s by one newspaper as the CIA's leading scientist. More importantly, to the UFO community, Pandolfi was rumored to be the head of the weird desk at the CIA (a term he is not fond of). This desk was rumored to be the CIA unit in charge of UFOs and other paranormal phenomena. More importantly, Pandolfi's close friend, Dan Smith, reported that Pandolfi, former Clinton CIA director James Woolsey, and China policy expert Mike Pillsbury were the UFO briefing team for the newly elected President. Pandolfi hinted in the message Collins posted that some sort of UFO disclosure might be planned under Trump: "They may be anticipating some action," Pandolfi wrote. "I have been waiting for President-Elect Trump to take office before taking more serious actions. He is very 'pro-disclosure' and very anti-disinformation.'" At the same time, a second disclosure initiative seemed to be forming. This movement centered around Blink-182 lead singer Tom DeLonge. He had been exposed in the leak of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta's, emails to WikiLeaks, as being involved in some official UFO disclosure effort. When Trump won the election, many figured the DeLonge initiative was over. However, I checked and was told that the DeLonge initiative was still alive. I asked whether the light was still green or had turned red. I was told it was still green and bigger than ever, with big names and big money behind it. This turned out to be true. On October 11, 2017, DeLonge held a news conference to announce the To the Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences (TTSA). A number of former high-level government officials on stage with him claimed to be a part of this effort to bring UFO disclosure to the American people. One of the officials on stage was Jim Semivan, a former high-level CIA official. In at least two conversations with researcher Melinda Leslie, Semivan confirmed that the TTSA effort was a constitutional process greenlit by the Pentagon. Later, Semivan confirmed that, before the New York Times's UFO page-one bombshell story that the government was studying UFOs, Semivan had gone to top officials in the three-letter agencies. He told them they had a chance to get the story out, but they couldn't. He stated that "we" are going to get it out. We will not reveal classified information, but we are disclosing. That was just before the New York Times article when Disclosure took off in the public. The Semivan connection was linked strangely to Pandolfi's view of TTSA and Semivan. He stated that "it is all fake. Just loons, crooks, and worse moving up the chain. Believe, Fear, and Give." I had known about Semivan before Hillary lost the election. I made my Disclosure of what I knew in my 2017 book, Managing Magic. I had been told that when Semivan experienced entities in his bedroom in the early 1990s, he went directly to Pandolfi and asked him what had happened. Pandolfi indicated that he was not cleared and would need additional tickets. In later interviews, Semivan confirmed that he received at least two briefings, including one that lasted 7 hours. It rattled him so much that he walked around in a daze for three months. He didn't get into what he was told, other than to say they had made no progress back-engineering UFOs and that all the psi stuff was real. When TTSA was announced, I asked someone in contact with Pandolfi, and strangely, even though both men had worked at high levels in the CIA, Pandolfi claimed he did not know who Semivan was. Later, that story was changed to say he does exist, but his name is not Semivan. This denial was strange, and the only explanation I could come up with was that Semivan was working for Pandolfi, or with him on the DeLonge UFO affair, and that giving away that association would kill the program and what they were trying to achieve. As to Trump's role in all the disclosure talk, I was told that Pandolfi had met with Trump many times in December 2016. I was approached to help prepare a briefing for Trump's first chief of staff, Reince Priebus. This briefing was the subject of an FOIA to the Trump library, and they have identified hundreds of pages of material. Time will tell what they release. I told the people talking to me about the Priebus briefing that if Trump appointed his people and they didn't know, or lied to the President, who would be to blame? I told the researcher who contacted me that there was little I could do to help. I certainly don't know where the alien bodies are kept. Trump had expressed no interest in UFOs at any of the times the subject had been brought up to him. A 31-second clip posted on YouTube shows Trump being yelled at about Disclosure while he signs hats and posters. Trump totally ignores the man confronting him. Then, when Hillary was talking about Disclosure in May 2016, Maureen Dowd at the New York Times confronted Trump on the subject. When asked about what Hillary had said, he again indicated no interest, saying, "They are talking about aliens, I assume. I'm not a big fan." So, what would happen about UFO disclosure under Trump? It appeared not much. We knew this because Trump got dragged into an admission by the War Department that they were investigating UFOs. That led to pressure from the House and the Senate to interview witnesses and receive briefings from the Navy and the Defense Intelligence Agency. When Trump was finally asked, however, he stated he did not care and did not believe. As this pressure built, Trump's favorite news network, Fox, started asking questions about UFOs. When ABC News finally asked Trump, he stated, "I want them to think whatever they think. I had one really brief meeting on it." When Fox host Tucker Carlson asked, a second time, Trump repeated what he had told ABC: "Well, I don't want to really get into it too much. But personally, I tend to doubt it. I'm not a believer, but you know, I guess anything is possible." The fact that Trump did not suddenly come forward to announce the ET presence indicated that perhaps the United States knows much less about UFOs than we have been led to believe. The facts seemed to spell out that the Navy showed Trump three Navy videos that had been leaked to the public and told him that they believed these were real UFOs. Beyond that, they really did not know anything. If they had back-engineered crafts, they would have told the President, and he would not have talked the way he did. There may be another classified dark section of government that does have absolute proof that UFOs are ET or inter-dimensional. It appears the Navy did not have the need to know about this. If that group does exist and has the information, it is running an insubordinate illegal operation – because it seems clear that they have kept it from the President, who is the civilian commander-in-chief of the military, the head of state that would oversee negotiating with off-world beings, the Chief Executive of the Government, and the head of all the United States intelligence agencies. The 2025 Transition: Meeting Rumors, Denials, and a Dinner On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump became the 47th President of the United States. His election and move into the Oval Office were seen as a good thing for UFO disclosure advocates because most disclosure proponents believe there is a deep state inside the government that is operating UFO programs illegally and off the books. Those conspiracy assessments were a big part of the Trump campaign. Trump and many elected Republicans, especially in the House, believed that somewhere in the swamp, UFOs and their potential threat to Americans were being hidden from elected officials – an idea that went back to Ronald Reagan's inaugural address: "Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." The past record showed something different. During the first Trump term, Lue Elizondo left his government job. Ron Pandolfi, who worked in intelligence at the time, insisted to me twice that Elizondo was a contractor in 2017 and did not work for the government. After Elizondo quit, he received threats from Trump Pentagon officials who, Elizondo stated, were "trying to nail him to the floor." He filed a complaint with the Pentagon inspector general, but his case was dismissed. Only when Biden came in did his top man in the Senate, Chuck Schumer, introduce an approved plan, giving people like Elizondo and Chris Mellon an indication they might see Disclosure. The Biden plan called for complete Disclosure over six years and proposed a nine-member panel under the President with subpoena power to force testimony. Three Republicans in the House and one in the Senate killed that proposal two years later. As soon as Trump was elected, some indications and rumors suggested advisor Dr. Ron Pandolfi would be doing something to encourage the new administration to act on UFOs. In November 2024, rumors circulated about a meeting with Trump to address the UFO mystery. Pandolfi denied it but still posted the rumor under the name RealRon. When I raised this on Facebook, Pandolfi confronted me, saying he was not RealRon and that an intern at his Kasmir Foundation was writing it. I replied that he had a very distinctive writing style and was attacking UFO advocates. One example of what RealRon was saying: Mental illness is not new, and it likely will be around for a long time. UFOs are just a manifestation of mental illness. Priests, Rabbis, Ministers, and Cult Leaders have been pushing. The reply came from his best friend, who referred to Ron's wife and the claim that she is not from around here, coming into the world through a portal: But then again, I'm not totally sure that drunken priests can totally explain the presence of three (Aliyah Pandolfi). RealRon immediately replied, basically confirming the extraordinary background of his wife: Three (Aliyah) can be present or not at her preference, not based on any physical constraints of this tiny world. The Pandolfi story was always weird, and it is getting weirder. At times, things that Ron was claiming were right in line with the people he was describing as loons, crooks, and worse. The first account of a UFO meeting came from Dan Smith on January 9, 2025. He insisted the meeting had been suggested by Jim Angleton, whose name was closely linked to UFO documents called the "New Majestic-12 Documents" leaked into the UFO community in the 1990s: I'm hearing that several known ufologists will be meeting with Donny, perhaps before the Inauguration. It will focus on the ETH… perhaps exclusively. The next day, Smith posted again: I do understand that although two (Ron Pandolfi) did not draw up the original list of attendees... he did have veto power over individuals. Then a correction: It seems that we have some corrections... I understood that two had vetoed some of the names. Wrong. He vetoed all the names. The second account – that there would be a meeting with Trump and researchers set up by Trump – came on January 16, posted by Dan Smith: So, we'll take another shot at this... There is going to be a UFO meeting this weekend. Besides Donny (Trump), it will include Jack Sarfatti... it will also include John Warner (son of Senator John Warner) and Chris Mellon. Leading the meeting will be three (Aliyah), and two (Ron Pandolfi) will also be in attendance. The purpose of the meeting will not be Disclosure. But now I can only speculate... The purpose of the meeting is to disclose the proximity of three to Donny. The purpose of Jack will be to spread the word. Donny will offer a glimpse behind the portal... it may be mostly implicit... either at the meeting and/or beyond. Otherwise, it will be lights in the sky. I am one of the few people who read the Open Minds Forum. I saw what Dan posted and reposted it on Facebook. At that point, all hell broke loose. Ron quickly made a denial: I don't mind all the psycho babble pseudo-philosophy, but I do mind all the false claims. Why harass everyone with false claims about meetings that are not going to occur and were never scheduled? Stick to psycho babble pseudo-philosophy. It can never be proven wrong. The problem is that Dan got the story of the meeting – along with the names of the participants – from Ron. Evidence: even though Ron denied there was a meeting, Dan reported that on Sunday, he was invited to Washington and had dinner with two of the people he mentioned as being in the Trump meeting – John Warner and Jack Sarfatti. What occurred to me was that Open Minds Forum has no audience. No one reads it, and only about five people post anything. By giving the story to Dan, Ron would have known that I would repost it, and between Facebook and Twitter, I have over 50,000 followers. The next thing that happened: John Warner wrote me an email which simply read "F*CK YOU AND NICOLE." It appeared he had found out that his involvement in a rumored UFO meeting with the President-elect was now public. He did not seem happy. As soon as I received this, I warned Nicole that she had been drawn into the controversy even though she had nothing to do with it (I had not even talked to her in a month). I contacted Ron and demanded that Warner apologize to Nicole. Eventually, she got one second-hand, where John said he was having a bad day. I contacted Jack Sarfatti, whom I had been talking to about his claim that he might get to brief Trump on what the New Jersey drones were and how their propulsion worked (though he thought it would be after Trump took office). I asked him to confirm or deny the story that he and four others had a meeting on the day before the Inauguration. That led him to demand that I remove every mention of the meeting, claiming it was for national security. I reminded him that I was a Canadian and did not give a damn about his national security. Ron weighed in with a Facebook message to me: "Hi Grant. You are not just a Crook; you are an Idiot." I assume he thought I should just let Sarfatti order me around. Sarfatti's defense was strange, given an email Pandolfi had sent him around the same time, effectively cutting him off from further communication for posting photos of the New Jersey drones. Sarfatti had written on his e-mail list that he was going to brief Trump: Trump already told Susan Wiles to have me come to WH sometime after January 20 to brief him on how I think the "drones" work and if they are a threat, etc. This is not the first time Trump was told about me by more than one person close to him. The issue now is if there will be a drone attack on D.C. on January 20. I will be there... I was asked by a member of Trump's team to submit this White Paper below on Conscious AI. He got in touch with me out of the blue and said he had tracked my work for thirty years and commented "awesome" on the "white paper" attached after he read it. Then, because he was posting material on the NJ drones that Pandolfi said did not exist, he was cut off. That is why it seemed very strange that Pandolfi, Warner, and Sarfatti – who had been pushing for Disclosure under Biden – were now covering up the meeting with Trump and secretly having dinner with Dan Smith, who originally mentioned the meeting and reposted it. The end of this bizarre story indicates a tour of the Naval Observatory and a dinner in D.C. the day before the Inauguration with Warner, Sarfatti, and Dan Smith (it is assumed Smith repeated something Ron told him). Mellon wasn't at the meeting, which makes sense since he is not a Trump supporter. Trump's Drone Report Promise – and What Actually Happened In front of a group of Republican governors, Trump made the following promise: I'm going to give you a report on drones about one day into the administration because I think it's ridiculous that they are not telling you about what is going on with the drones. Nobody is reporting it. I don't know why. Nobody knows why they don't want to talk about it. Nobody wants to talk about it. It could be us sending drones. I hope that is the case. Trump reaffirmed this promise near the end of Day 1 when he took a drone question from a reporter: I would like to find out what it is and tell the people. Could we find out what that was, Susie (Wiles, Chief of Staff)? Why don't we find out immediately? Days went by without a drone report from the President. He did, however, produce an executive order that declassified the John and Robert Kennedy assassination files, plus the Martin Luther King files held by the government. I posted every day how many hours it had been since the report was promised. Eventually, Pandolfi posted the following replies on my Facebook wall: January 24 – "There are no drones, so Pres. Trump's report is complete. Stop stirring up the Loons with your fake news." January 25 – "I said the Drone Report was complete and on time. The best way to address a non-issue is with a non-report." Eight days after the report was supposed to come out, there was a statement from President Trump: Update on the New Jersey drones. After research and study, the drones that were flying over New Jersey in large numbers were authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons. Many of these drones were also hobbyists, recreational, and private individuals that enjoy flying drones, and in time it got worse due to curiosity. This was not the enemy. Donald Trump Jr. Weighs In The remaining story of how the Trump administration will handle Disclosure will have to be the subject of another book. The issue is a big issue in Congress, and the President's son is very interested and pushing for openness. Here is what he stated in one interview on a Rumble stream: It should not surprise us that we can now say fairly definitively it seems that there's evidence of non-human intelligence out there engaging with our planet. It's also almost so shocking. It's hard to digest. I mean, this would be one of the biggest questions, perhaps of eternity. In an interview with Ross Coulthart, he hypothesized how someone like Elon Musk could be used to solve the UFO mystery: Obviously, I've spent a lot more time with Elon Musk in the last few months during the transition. I've been down to see SpaceX launch and the technology that he's been able to create. You would think that they'd want to read in individuals like that... Obviously, they'd have to go through whatever clearance processes, but wouldn't we want to allow perhaps our greatest geniuses? I'm sure he and his top scientists are probably far more competent than anyone we have in government as it relates to propulsion systems, et cetera. Coulthart encouraged him to bring it up with his father: I'm definitely going to do that. Like I said, you know that I'm interested. It was the one – if I had one question, that was the one I wanted to know. So maybe we'll finally get to the bottom of it. I'm working on it. We're working on it. Promise. Update with Latest Information (as of late March / early April 2026) In March 2026, a rumor circulated in the UFO community that President Trump had prepared (or was planning) a major disclosure speech confirming alien contact, reportedly tied to the Roswell anniversary around July 8, 2026. UK filmmaker Mark Christopher Lee publicly claimed insider knowledge and cited a private message from billionaire UFO researcher Robert Bigelow as his source. Here is the message from February 2, 2026. Veteran UFO journalist George Knapp quickly debunked the story on X (Twitter). On March 27, 2026, Knapp posted: This is bullshit. I spoke to Robert Bigelow less than 30 minutes ago. He says he has never met, spoken to, or emailed Mr. Lee. Anyone who knows Mr. B is aware he would NEVER share private, sensitive info with some random UFO guy in a foreign country. It is not only false but preposterous." Bigelow confirmed the denial directly to Knapp. Lee later admitted he had not properly verified the information, apologized, and the claim collapsed entirely. Vice President JD Vance and the "Demons" Adding another layer to the Trump administration's evolving public stance on UFOs/UAPs, Vice President JD Vance addressed the topic directly in a March 27, 2026, interview on the conservative podcast The Benny Show hosted by Benny Johnson. Vance described himself as "obsessed" with UFO files and vowed to use his access to the highest levels of classification to "get to the bottom of the UFO files." He said unexplained phenomena fit better within a Christian worldview of supernatural forces than extraterrestrials. The remarks drew immediate and widespread press coverage. Mainstream media quotes include: Fox News: "I don't think they're aliens. I think they're demons anyway," Vance noted. He later elaborated, framing unexplained phenomena through a Christian lens of good and evil. The Hill: "I don't think they're aliens, I think they're demons anyway, but that's a longer discussion," Vance said. The Guardian (comment piece titled "JD Vance thinks space aliens are 'demons'. Who can blame him?" ): The article offered a tongue-in-cheek take, suggesting earthly troubles might make demonic explanations appealing. Entertainment Weekly: "I don't think they're aliens. I think they're demons," he said on a recent podcast. Vance is the latest politician to wade into little-green-man discourse. On X (Twitter), reactions were polarized and highly viral. Comment quotes from posters include: "JD Vance says aliens are just demons in disguise, causing mischief around our planet." "VANCE'S 'DEMON' DECREE: VP JD Vance: 'I don't think they're aliens... I think they're demons.' As Artemis II heads to the Moon, the 'Spiritual Disclosure' is moving faster than the rocket." As soon as I heard Vance had rambled about demons and claimed he had a "tippy top" security clearance, I contacted the man who, from 1983 to 2025, I believe is the keeper of the security keys and a possible subject-matter expert on UFOs for President Trump: Ron Pandolfi. Keep in mind that the biggest question in ufology is not "what are UFOs?" It is "What the hell is Ron Pandolfi up to?" He is a secretive and elusive figure. The important question is: Is Pandolfi the President's UFO expert? In addition, an important email from December 17, 2017, clearly shows that Pandolfi is the subject-matter expert on UFOs. That date is significant because it is the same day the New York Times published its major front-page story about the U.S. government studying UFOs, including the claim that billionaire Robert Bigelow was constructing facilities in Las Vegas to handle recovered UFO hardware. The email was a conversation between Hal Puthoff (chief physicist for the Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Application Program, AAWSAP), physicist Robert Collins, former "Weird Desk" director Dr. Kit Green, and Pandolfi. The discussion focused on the security measures that would have been involved in the AAWSAP program. Robert Collins was critical of Senator Harry Reid, writing to Hal Puthoff: A secret Pentagon UFO program? Another case of the Left lying to the Right: what conventional lies and thinking with multi-millions wasted: Obviously, Reid wasn't 'read in' like Hillary... – Rmc On the same day, a reply came from Kit Green (codename Blue Jay in the Aviary): Actually, he was. That makes total sense, as Reid would have been one of the Gang of Eight who got a limited briefing on waived, unacknowledged special access programs like UFOs. Ten years later, this was confirmed by Dr. James Lacatski, who stated on the record that in 2011 he was providing a briefing in a congressional facility where he described, among other things, that the U.S. government had recovered a flying saucer and that they had managed to breach the craft (indicating that up until then they had been unable to get in). Lacatski confirmed that a Senator (later identified as Reid) had been in the briefing. Thirty minutes later, on December 17, Pandolfi spelled out to the group how classified briefings are done and his role in briefing curious politicians on UFOs: The problem with being 'read in' is that it does not include any information, just a key to a place where information might be accessible and a warning that accessing that location could be associated with significant risk. Politicians are extremely risk-averse, and accessing the location where the key might have value is extremely difficult. I keep a handful of keys in my pocket for just such an occasion when a politician might demand access. 'Here you are, sir or madam; you now have a key; use it at great personal risk, or leave that to me.' Next, Pandolfi pointed out to everyone on the email chain that the list of 20 names "is a pretty good list of the other poker players in the tournament. They include Rick Doty under many names (Doty had five different emails), so the list is nearly as long as it appears. – Ron" The last item that indicated Pandolfi was probably the subject-matter expert on UFOs: Ron told me in 2025 that he had been close friends with Trump for over 10 years. This was backed up by a friend of Ron's named Ryan, who told me in March 2026 that Pandolfi was actually President Trump's favorite CIA officer. With 90% certainty that Pandolfi is the President's subject matter expert, I contacted Pandolfi about the claims being made by Vance that UFO occupants are demons and asked: What the hell are you briefing these clowns on? Surprisingly, he replied: The VP does not receive briefings. That reminded me of something Pandolfi's friend, Dan Smith, posted on the Open Minds Forum. Smith talked about trying to get Pandolfi to brief then-President-Elect George Bush. Smith reported that when he made the suggestion, Pandolfi said: The Presidents cannot be players. I made the joke that maybe that is why the Iranians said they wanted Vance to lead negotiations – Vance believes in demons, and the Iranians think the United States is the Great Satan. They would get along great. Not sure if Pandolfi said that, but I got another e-mail from Pandolfi saying: And Iran does not want the gay friek leading negotiations. The two negotiators assigned were Special Envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, the President's son-in-law. I looked but could not see that either of them was gay, so I am still confused about what Pandolfi was referring to. Going back to the briefing where the VP is not briefed and then runs around talking about demons, I said, "You'd better change that. This is embarrassing." Then, seemingly confirming that he briefed the subject, Ron wrote back: That has been a standing policy for over 50 years. Should the gay freak become President, he will receive briefings, but not by me. The final point worth making is this: if the Vice President truly believes we are dealing with demons, then Semivan's warning – that we understand very little about what we're actually confronting – may be far more accurate than most people want to admit. Finally, U.S. Congressman Eric Burlison (R-Mo.) has claimed that the Trump White House has authorized him to access classified facilities linked to UAPs, directing the Department of Defense to facilitate these visits. Serving on the House Oversight and Accountability Committee—the congressional committee investigating Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena—Burlison has already toured one such site. While he declined to name the location publicly, subsequent reporting suggests his first visit was to Naval Air Station Patuxent River in Maryland, long rumored to be tied to UAP reverse-engineering and storage. At Patuxent River, Burlison reportedly found no physical hardware or biological remains. Sources indicate he verified the existence of a specialized hangar built to transfer advanced material, but the hangar was empty because the CIA blocked the alleged transfer. Burlison has framed the visit as a success in providing contextual evidence—such as purpose-built infrastructure—that corroborates whistleblowers' narratives. He has stated that he hopes to visit at least four more domestic sites, though one foreign location (rumored to be South Korea) that houses an "immovable" object remains a future goal. Footnotes

UPDATE: Trump UAP Disclosure Push – April 8, 2026
UPDATE: Trump UAP Disclosure Push – April 8, 2026 Since late February, a series of rapid developments has reshaped the UAP disclosure landscape. What began as a presidential directive has since sparked crypto-market frenzies, renewed legislative pressure, and stark insider warnings about the scale of any potential release. Here is the current state of play: 1. Trump’s order – symbolic or substantive? On February 19, 2026, President Trump directed all federal agencies to identify and prepare for the release of government files related to UAPs, UFOs, and extraterrestrial life. 1 The Truth Social announcement cited “tremendous interest” and claimed prior administrations had hidden information. However, the order largely mirrors a 2023 measure signed by President Biden, which already mandated similar collection and release through the National Archives. 2 Critics note that the executive branch retains a 25-year declassification window, meaning no immediate document dump is guaranteed. 2. The “Trump UAP Coin” phenomenon Within 48 hours of Trump’s announcement, a meme coin named “Aliens Are Real” surged over 8,000%, from $0.00005 to $0.002, pushing its market cap past $2 million. 3 The token launched just days before the presidential order, fueling speculation of coordinated hype. No official “Trump UAP coin” exists, but the episode illustrated how political disclosure narratives are being quickly monetized in crypto markets. 3. Coulthart’s call for an executive order Investigative journalist Ross Coulthart, host of “Reality Check,” has repeatedly argued that Trump’s directive is insufficient. In a March 2026 interview, Coulthart stated that “unless he orders all these government agencies to declassify these files … it’ll never happen.” 4 Coulthart emphasizes that intelligence agencies have ignored past presidential memoranda, and only a binding executive order with penalties for noncompliance would force actual release. 4. Burchett’s escalating claims Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN), co-founder of the House UAP Caucus, initially praised Trump’s move but has since raised the rhetorical stakes. In early April, Burchett claimed that multiple government and military sources have confirmed direct contact with extraterrestrials. He added that if the information he had been briefed on were released, the country “would’ve come unglued.” 5 To underscore his sincerity, Burchett has offered to take a polygraph test – a challenge not yet taken up by any agency. 5. What remains unknown No classified documents have been publicly released as of this update. The Pentagon has declined to comment on specific records, and the White House has not announced a timeline. Meanwhile, former Pentagon official Lue Elizondo warned that even a limited disclosure would be a “tremendous undertaking,” given more than 80 years of accumulated secret archives. 6 Endnotes 1 Donald J. Trump, Truth Social post, February 19, 2026. (“I am hereby directing every federal agency to identify and release all files relating to UAPs, UFOs, and extraterrestrial life. The public has waited long enough.”) 2 UAP Disclosure Act of 2023, enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, Pub. L. No. 118-31, § 1683 (2023) (mandating National Archives collection and review of UAP records with a 25-year presumptive release deadline). 3 CoinMarketCap data, “Aliens Are Real (ALIENS) token,” February 21–22, 2026. (Peak price $0.002; market cap $2.1M; 24h volume $14.6M.) 4 Ross Coulthart, “Reality Check” podcast, episode 412, March 5, 2026. (“A press release isn’t disclosure. Trump needs an executive order that actually compels agencies to hand over the files – with consequences if they don’t.”) 5 Rep. Tim Burchett, interview on “The Shawn Ryan Show,” April 2, 2026. (“I’ve had people inside the government and the military tell me we are not alone. They’ve made contact. If I told you everything I know, you wouldn’t sleep tonight.”) 6 Lue Elizondo, statement to NewsNation, March 10, 2026. (“We are talking about eighty-plus years of secrets. Even a limited disclosure would require thousands of man-hours and unprecedented political will.”)

The President and the Veil:
Obama's Dance with the Unknown
It comes close, teases us, cajoles us, and lies to us, but you can never take it home to meet the parents. It won't allow you to do that. Jim Semivan, the former CIA man who saw entities in his bedroom, said that about the paranormal's "Wow factor." He was right. And nowhere is that teasing more evident than in the public record of the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama. For eight years, the most powerful man on the planet winked at the American public about little green men. It was a pattern of performance—a political tic disguised as transparency. Obama would stand at a podium, invoke the statistical likelihood of extraterrestrial life with the sober authority of a constitutional law professor, and then, with the practiced timing of a stand-up comic, undercut his own seriousness with a punchline. This was the Obama doctrine on UFOs: plausible deniability wrapped in a smirk. The President arrived in office promising to drain the swamp of secrecy. Or at least to keep it at a manageable, photogenic level. "I will never hide the truth because it's uncomfortable," said Obama at the National Archives on May 21, 2009. I will deal with Congress and the courts as co-equal branches of government. I will tell the American people what I know and don't know, and when I release something publicly or keep something secret, I will tell you why." [1] "I ran for President promising transparency, and I meant what I said. That is why, whenever possible, we will make information available to the American people so that they can make informed judgments and hold us accountable. But I have never argued, and never will, that our most sensitive national security matters should be an open book." [1] This was the classic politician's pivot: a promise of total sunlight that comes with a pre-approved list of acceptable shadows. The National Archives—a temple of public record-keeping—was a carefully chosen backdrop, entirely unaware of the joke being played inside its marble halls. Obama first dealt with the UFO/ET question while running for the Democratic nomination. A Chicago reporter from CBS asked: If elected and you learned the government knew aliens had visited Earth, but the public didn't, would you make sure the public found out? Obama, like many politicians before him, used humor to defuse. "Well, it depends on what these aliens are like," he replied, "and whether they are Democrats or Republicans." This was the signature Obama move. Defuse the potentially radioactive situation with a joke. Render the question simultaneously answered and entirely unanswered. Then, during a Democratic debate in October 2007, host Tim Russert pressed him. All three Apollo 11 astronauts had said they thought there was life elsewhere in the universe. What did Obama think? His answer was pure professorial evasion:[2] I don't know, and I don't presume to know. What I know is there is life here on Earth, and that we're not attending to life here on Earth. He won the presidency, of course. And like so many presidents before and after him, nothing happened on the UFO front. This was, in fact, the moment the Obama White House showed its true colors. UFO enthusiasts—who had hoped the cool, law-review, post-partisan President might be different—were quickly disabused. John Podesta, a Clinton-era chief of staff running Obama's transition, had publicly called for declassifying UFO records. Bill Richardson, governor of New Mexico, had spoken of a "cover-up." The Extraterrestrial Phenomenon Political Action Committee wrote an earnest letter demanding an end to the "six-decade truth embargo." They got exactly nothing. The truth embargo, it turned out, was bipartisan. And Podesta, ever the loyal soldier, shut up about it the moment he got inside the tent. During a March 21, 2012, trip to Roswell, New Mexico, President Obama did what every President before him had done. He joked about aliens in his opening remarks.[3] We had landed in Roswell. I announced to people when I landed that I had come in peace (laughter). Let me tell you, there are more nine- and ten-year-old boys around the country; when I meet them, they ask me, 'Have you been to Roswell, and is it true what they say?' And I tell them, 'If I told you, I would have to kill you.' So, their eyes get all big, so we're going to keep our secrets here. It appeared, for a breathless moment, that Obama had just revealed the secret—that an alien presence was being covered up. The message that the government would keep its Roswell secrets directly contradicted the official Air Force investigations of 1994 and 1997 (no crash, no cover-up). It also contradicted an official statement issued just four months earlier, in November 2011, by the Science Advisor's office to the President.[6] Searching for ET, But No Evidence Yet The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race. In addition, no credible information suggests that anyone is hiding evidence from the public. The Roswell quip did not appear to be part of the official speech text. Either a tongue slip or a planned leak. What made it even more significant was that the President did the same thing again. And again. A couple of weeks later, in May 2012, Obama made an alien comment while on a tour of the White House with actor Will Smith and his family. A private conversation, yes. But Obama—a man who measured every syllable—would have known the story would get repeated. It did.[4] Jaden Smith, Will's 14-year-old son, wanted to ask President Obama about aliens. Will asked him not to. When the tour arrived in the Situation Room—a 5,000-square-foot basement bunker run by the National Security Council—Jaden prepared to ask his question. Obama, somehow, already knew it was coming. He looked at Jaden and said, "Don't tell me, the aliens, right?" Jaden confirmed. Obama then deployed what intelligence professionals call a Glomar response—the phrase used when you cannot even acknowledge the existence of a classified program. "I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of extraterrestrials," Obama told Jaden. "But I can tell you if there had been a top-secret meeting, it would have taken place in this very room." Speaking of his encounter with the President, Jaden stated,[4] I talked to President Obama about extraterrestrials. He said he could neither confirm nor deny the existence of aliens, which means they're real. If people think we're the only people that live in this universe, then something is wrong with them. Jaden Smith, age fourteen, had just outmaneuvered the leader of the free world on the semantics of Disclosure. The White House press corps did not notice. Why would they? The materialist worldview—Personality One in full command—had long since decided that UFO questions were beneath the dignity of a president. They were wrong, of course. But that didn't matter. Obama continued his alien talk during an August 13, 2012, phone call to NASA. He was calling to congratulate the agency on the successful landing of the Curiosity rover on Mars. But instead of simple congratulations, Obama—strangely, as Bill Clinton had almost twenty years earlier—brought up Martians.[5] Someone asked me the other day if we had already found Martians. I told them we have to give you a little bit of time. If, in fact, you do make contact with Martians, please let me know right away because I've got a lot of other things on my plate, but I suspect that will go to the top of the list, even if they're just microbes. Fortunately for Obama, each comment was delivered with a humorous tone that kept the media asleep. The press corps, trapped in its own reductionist cage, saw only a funny president being funny. They did not see what was actually happening: a sitting head of state repeatedly poking holes in the official narrative, winking at the very people who knew something was off. Then, at the 2013 Kennedy Center Honors, the President took the joke to a new level. In doing so, he inadvertently made history. The night was meant to celebrate the recipients, one of whom was actress and author Shirley MacLaine—famous for her public, outspoken belief in UFOs and extraterrestrial contact. At the podium, Obama addressed the audience and the honoree directly.[7] Now, when you first become President, one of the questions that people ask you is, what's really going on in Area 51? When I wanted to know, I'd call Shirley MacLaine. … I think I just became the first president to ever publicly mention Area 51. How's that, Shirley? Declassified CIA documents had acknowledged the official existence of the Groom Lake facility just months earlier.[8] But Obama was indeed the first sitting president to utter the name "Area 51" in a public speech.[7] His statement about calling MacLaine—clearly a joke—served to officially connect the President of the United States with the world's most famous UFO conspiracy theory in a public forum. The line between official denial and unofficial intrigue had never been blurrier. The OSTP Follies: How the White House Rigged the Experiment In November 2011, the White House sent a reply through its Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to a petition filed by UFO lobbyist Steven Bassett. The petition asked the government to acknowledge an extraterrestrial presence engaging the human race formally—the so-called Disclosure. The White House reply denied an ET presence on Earth. It also denied that the government had covered anything up.[6] The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race. In addition, no credible information suggests that any evidence is being hidden from the public. Because this statement ran directly counter to the general opinion of the American people (roughly half of whom, in poll after poll, believe the government is hiding something), I filed seven Freedom of Information Act requests to find out what happened behind the scenes. The results, as expected, were not encouraging. This is the same kind of bureaucratic stonewalling that has protected the UFO secret for seventy years. Same playbook, different administration. The FOIA documents released by the OSTP—about fifty pages in total—can be summed up by one line written by OSTP public relations officer Phil Larson, the man who actually wrote the White House reply. In an email to David Weaver and Bob Jacobs at NASA, Larson stated:[9] The first FOIA asked what the OSTP had used for research to produce its official government statement that there is "no credible evidence" that ETs have visited Earth. The answer, according to the FOIA, was nothing. They had no documents in the office concerning UFOs or extraterrestrials. Not a single piece of paper.[9] The official conclusion of "no credible evidence" was therefore not supported by any evidence itself, whether credible or not. The Obama White House had become like a student who writes a book report without reading the book. Even more unpardonable: the FOIA revealed that the OSTP did not seek any evidence. The scientific arm of the White House was caught rigging the experiment to reach a preordained conclusion. My 37 years on a university campus showed me that this is how institutional power works. Physicists don't talk to chemists. Chemists don't talk to biologists. And the White House certainly doesn't talk to the public except through carefully filtered press releases. The OSTP's response was not science. It was politics wearing a lab coat. Another FOIA request sought all drafts of the ET petition response—to determine who wrote it, which outside agencies had input, and which words were changed. This kind of draft analysis has worked well in the past. (The famous "alien invasion" remark in Ronald Reagan's 1987 United Nations speech, for example, was pulled by speechwriters and only restored when Reagan himself penned a note to put it back in.) The hope was that this FOIA would provide similar insights. The plan was thwarted by the OSTP FOIA archivists' constant use of the B5 exemption. In short, this exemption says that any internal advice is exempt from release because, if it were not, people would be reluctant to give advice. Page after page was blacked out. None of the four people who appeared to work on the ET reply had their advice or opinions made public. The OSTP simply used the B5 exemption to cover everything that happened behind the scenes. One FOIA sought to determine who tasked Larson with drafting the official ET petition reply. That FOIA failed to produce a name.[9] It failed because Katelyn Sabochik, who used to run the "We the People" site on my former website, assigned the ET petition reply to OSTP. Since she does not work for OSTP, she—and whoever gives her orders—are exempt from the scope of the FOIA. The FOIA documents showed that NASA was the only outside agency OSTP contracted for comment and correction. In previous administrations, the OSTP had contacted the CIA. This time, it did not. At NASA, Bob Jacobs (Deputy Assistant Administrator for Public Affairs) and David Weaver (Associate Administrator for Communications) had been sent a draft of the ET petition response. Both had nothing to add or change. This was no surprise. Neither man is a working scientist with any expertise in UFOs. They are senior administrators specializing in government, politics, media relations, and public policy. When the OSTP went public with its reply, Jacobs retweeted the news on his Twitter page but did not mention his involvement. The most essential document in the FOIA release was the reply to the request asking for all documents showing that President Obama—or someone representing him in the Oval Office—saw the petition that 12,000+ people thought was sent to him. The reply was "no records." According to available OSTP records, Obama never saw the petition.[9] Let that sink in. Twelve thousand citizens took the time to sign a petition asking their President to acknowledge contact with non-human intelligence. And the President never saw it. The White House's vaunted "We the People" platform was, in reality, a Potemkin village. A shallow political marketing effort. Sort of like the appeal you'll hear many times in the next election cycle: your vote counts. The documents also confirmed that the evidence for a possible ET presence on Earth remains unchallenged. It's not as if the White House did a study and found that UFO researchers are wrong. They simply didn't look. This is the same lazy empiricism that Harlow Shapley brought to his 1920 debate about whether other galaxies existed. Shapley, from the Harvard Observatory, declared: It seems to me that the evidence ... is opposed to the view that the spirals are individual galaxies comparable with our own. In fact, there appears as yet no reason for modifying the tentative hypothesis that the spirals are not composed of typical stars at all but are truly nebulous objects. Shapley was wrong. The skeptics were wrong about Columbus. They were wrong about Galileo. And they are wrong about UFOs. The OSTP's denial of ET reality will look just as foolish to future generations. The final irony: the White House's denial of ET and the cover-up turned the whole petition into a joke of democracy. The "We the People" concept was established so the average citizen could get an answer from the White House on important issues. After the ET petition was addressed, the required number of signatures rose to 25,000. Later, a group got 25,000 signatures asking the White House about building a "Death Star." At that point, the signature threshold was raised to 100,000. This means the government is answerable to the voters—provided you have 99,999 friends who will sign your petition. Late-Night Revelations and a Presidential Joke The pattern of public humor and private evasion continued into Obama's post-presidency. In March 2015, while still in office, Obama appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live! The host pressed him, as he had with Bill Clinton, about whether he had searched the White House files for the truth. Kimmel admitted that seeking out the Area 51 files would be his first act as President. Obama shut him down with a smirk:[10] That's why you will not be President. The aliens won't let it happen. ... They exercise strict control over us. When Kimmel recounted that Clinton had looked and reported there was nothing, Obama replied with a loaded smirk:[10] That's what we're expected to say. The dance continued in 2016 on The Ellen DeGeneres Show. Ellen brought out six-year-old "presidential expert" Macey Hensley, who asked the President about the legendary "Book of Secrets." She theorized the secrets could include whether "aliens are real." [11] "That's a secret," the President quipped. Macey pressed further. Obama finally gave her a direct, if careful, answer:[11] We haven't actually made direct contact with aliens yet. When we do, I'll let you know. In 2017, Obama played golf with pro Jordan Spieth. According to Spieth, Obama walked up to a putt, casually mentioned that as President he got to see the aliens, and then added: "They're freaking crazy looking." He sank the putt, winked, and walked off. Spieth told the story to Golf Digest.[14] It was pure Obama: a joke so deadpan that no one could quite tell if it was a joke at all. But consider: why would a former president, a man who has nothing to gain by lying about aliens, make that specific claim? Unless, of course, he was telling the truth. In 2020, after leaving office, Obama appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. When Colbert asked if he had ever received briefings about aliens and UFOs, Obama gave his most classic Glomar response yet.[12] "Certainly, asked about it," said Obama. "And?" pressed Colbert. "Can't tell you," replied Obama, with an impish grin. "Sorry." Colbert took this non-answer as confirmation. "All right, I'll take that as a 'yes,' because if there were none, you'd say there was none." Obama, playing into the charade, did nothing to discourage him. "Feel free to think that," the former President said.[12] Finally, in 2021, Obama appeared on The Late Show with James Corden. The question came not from the host but from bandleader Reggie Watts, who asked about "dem aliens" and "UAFs." With a laugh, Obama revealed just how persistent his own curiosity had been.[13] When it comes to the aliens, there are some things I just can't tell you on-air. ... I asked, right? I was like, 'All right, is there a lab somewhere where we're keeping the alien specimens and spaceship?' And you know, they did a little bit of research, and the answer was no. Then he added a serious note—confirming the reality of unexplained phenomena:[13] What is true, and I'm actually being serious here, is that there is footage and records of objects in the skies that we don't know exactly what they are. We can't explain how they moved or their trajectory. They didn't follow an easily explainable pattern. With that, he summed up the entire Obama-era paradox on UFOs: a president who publicly jokes and evades, yet privately asks the same questions as everyone else, confirming the mystery while denying the answer. The pattern remained consistent long after he left the Oval Office. It is the same pattern Rey Hernandez saw in his vision on the Miami freeway—the wheel with many spokes, each a different paranormal phenomenon, all connected by a single source. After leaving the White House, Barack and Michelle Obama continued their fascination with the unknown through their production company, Higher Ground Productions. The company, which they run for Netflix, quietly began developing a film project based on one of the most famous UFO abduction stories in American history: the case of Betty and Barney Hill.[15] The Hills claimed they were abducted by aliens while driving through New Hampshire's White Mountains in September 1961. They were experimented on, becoming the first widely publicized supposed abduction in the United States. The film, reportedly titled White Mountains, would adapt their account. As one UFC fighter and relative of Barney Hill put it, "If you're gonna do a story about the first black man to be abducted by aliens, get the black side of the family to talk about it." [15] That the Obamas chose this particular story—a tale of involuntary transport, missing time, and non-human intelligence—suggests that their interest in the phenomenon is more than casual. It suggests a knowingness. Then, in February 2026, the former President stepped directly into the firestorm. Appearing on the podcast No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen, Obama was asked during a lightning round a question that had followed him for nearly two decades: "Are aliens real?" His answer was immediate and direct.[16] They're real, but I haven't seen them," Obama replied, adding, "And they're not being kept in… what is it? Area 51. There's no underground facility unless there's this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the President of the United States. The viral clip exploded across the internet. Headlines worldwide declared that a former president had just confirmed the existence of extraterrestrials. Within hours, the 44th president was forced to walk back his statement. On Instagram, he posted a clarification alongside the clip.[16] I was trying to stick with the spirit of the speed round, but since it's gotten attention, let me clarify. Statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there's life out there. But the distances between solar systems are so great that the chances aliens have visited us are low, and I saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us. Really! The clarification did little to stop the political fallout. On February 19, 2026, aboard Air Force One, President Donald Trump was asked about Obama's remarks. His response was swift and explosive. Trump accused his predecessor of leaking classified information—an unprecedented charge by one President against another.[17] "He gave classified information. He's not supposed to be doing that," Trump told reporters. "He made a big mistake. He took it out of classified information." When asked if he himself believed aliens were real, Trump demurred, saying, "I don't know if they're real or not." But then he added a remarkable promise: "I may get him out of trouble by declassifying." Hours later, Trump took to his Truth Social platform and issued a formal directive to the federal government.[17] Based on the tremendous interest shown, I will be directing the Secretary of War, and other relevant Departments and Agencies, to begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters. The order targeted the Department of War and other agencies. In the days that followed, the Department of War confirmed it was complying with the President's directive. NASA, for its part, issued a statement through a spokeswoman reaffirming its commitment to open science. But one of its senior scientists, Dr. Gentry Lee—a veteran of the agency since 1968—was characteristically dismissive: "There is nothing to indicate that any aliens or alien ships have ever landed on planet Earth. If you think otherwise, you are misinformed." Dr. Lee sounds exactly like Harlow Shapley. And he is just as wrong. The political clash between a sitting president and his predecessor over the existence of extraterrestrials was unprecedented. Obama had been forced to clarify his remarks. Trump had used them to launch a declassification order. The intelligence agencies of the United States were now formally reviewing their secret files on UFOs. Two months later, nothing had yet occurred. This is the way of the Big Game. It comes close, teases us, cajoles us, lies to us. It will not let you take it home to meet the parents. Jim Semivan was right. But that doesn't mean the game isn't real. It only means the rules are not what we were taught. The wheel turns. The spokes—abductions, UFOs, near-death experiences, psychedelic journeys, ghost communications—are all connected. And Barack Obama, whether he knew it or not, spent sixteen years spinning that wheel for all of us to see. The full story of what President Trump's order ultimately revealed—and the consequences of the clash between the 44th and 45th presidents—continues in the Trump chapter. Endnotes for the Obama Chapter [1] Remarks by the President at the National Archives, May 21, 2009. National Archives and Records Administration. (Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov) [2] "Transcript: the Democratic debate." October 30, 2007. NBC News. (Source: nbcnews.com) [3] Shear, Michael D. "Obama, in Roswell, Says 'I Come in Peace.'" March 21, 2012. The Caucus blog, The New York Times. (Source: thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com) [4] Mikelbank, Peter. "Will Smith's Son Asked Obama About Aliens." May 16, 2012. People. (Source: people.com) / "Will Smith Embarrassed By Son's Alien Question To Barack Obama." May 16, 2012. HuffPost. (Source: huffpost.com) [5] "President Obama Calls NASA's Curiosity Team." August 13, 2012. NASA TV. (Source: nasa.gov) [6] "Searching for ET, But No Evidence Yet." November 7, 2011. Office of Science and Technology Policy, The White House. (Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov) / Larson, Phil. "The fact is we have no credible evidence of extraterrestrial presence here on Earth." Email exchange with NASA officials. Released via FOIA. [7] "Remarks by the President at the Kennedy Center Honors." December 8, 2013. The White House Office of the Press Secretary. (Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov) [8] Central Intelligence Agency. "The CIA and the U-2 Program, 1954-1974." August 2013. Declassified FOIA document. (Source: cia.gov) [9] Greenewald, John. The Black Vault. FOIA Case F-2012-01407, Obama Presidential Library. (Source: theblackvault.com) [10] "President Obama Chats With Jimmy Kimmel." March 12, 2015. Jimmy Kimmel Live! ABC. (Source: youtube.com/watch?v=Khk8R8X0xLg) [11] "President Obama Answers a 6-Year-Old's Question About Aliens." February 12, 2016. The Ellen DeGeneres Show. (Source: ellentube.com) [12] "Barack Obama On UFOs: 'I Certainly Asked About It.'" December 1, 2020. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. CBS. (Source: youtube.com/watch?v=5qohtIfpAZM) [13] "Obama Jokes That First Question He Asked as President Concerned Aliens." May 18, 2021. People. (Source: people.com) [14] "Jordan Spieth reveals how Barack Obama used trash talk and aliens to win their recent match." October 27, 2017. Golf Digest. (Source: golfdigest.com) [15] "Netflix Eyes' White Mountains' Movie Adaptation from Higher Ground Productions." December 15, 2022. What's on Netflix. (Source: whats-on-netflix.com) [16] Cohen, Brian Tyler. "Obama on Aliens, the Future of the Democratic Party, & His Marriage Advice." February 14, 2026. No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (Podcast). (Source: youtube.com/watch?v=0Af__t6o96A) / Obama, Barack (@barackobama). Instagram post. February 15, 2026. (Source: instagram.com) [17] Samuels, Brett. "Trump says Obama' gave classified information' by saying aliens are 'real.'" February 19, 2026. The Hill. (Source: thehill.com) / Shear, Michael D. "Trump Orders Release of Government Files on Aliens and UFOs." February 19, 2026. The New York Times. (Source: nytimes.com)

Obama Talks UFOs
Let's be clear about the essential absurdity right from the start. Barack Obama, the most deliberately cool, constitutionally cautious, and rhetorically airbrushed man to occupy the Oval Office in a generation, spent eight years winking at the American public about little green men. It was a pattern of performance. A political tic disguised as transparency. He would stand at a podium, invoke the statistical likelihood of extraterrestrial life with the sober authority of a constitutional law professor, and then, with the practiced timing of a seasoned comedian, undercut his own seriousness with a punchline. This was the Obama doctrine on UFOs: plausible deniability wrapped in a smirk. The President arrived in office promising to drain the swamp of secrecy. Or at least keep it at a manageable, photogenic level. "I will never hide the truth because it's uncomfortable," said Obama at the National Archives on May 21, 2009. I will deal with Congress and the courts as coequal branches of government. I will tell the American people what I know and don't know, and when I release something publicly or keep something secret, I will tell you why." [1] "I ran for President promising transparency, and I meant what I said. That is why, whenever possible, we will make information available to the American people so that they can make informed judgments and hold us accountable. But I have never argued, and never will, that our most sensitive national security matters should be an open book." [1] This was the classic politician's pivot: a promise of total sunlight that comes with a pre-approved list of acceptable shadows. The National Archives, by the way, was a carefully chosen backdrop—a temple of public record-keeping, entirely unaware of the joke being played inside its marble halls. Obama first dealt with the UFO/ET question while running for the Democratic nomination. A Chicago reporter from CBS asked: If elected and you learned the government knew aliens had visited Earth, but the public didn't, would you make sure the public found out? Obama, like many politicians before him, used humor to defuse. "Well, it depends on what these aliens are like," he replied, "and whether they are Democrats or Republicans." This was the signature Obama move. Defuse the potentially radioactive situation with a joke. Render the question simultaneously answered and entirely unanswered. Then, during a Democratic debate in October 2007, host Tim Russert pressed him. All three Apollo 11 astronauts had said they thought there was life elsewhere in the universe. What did Obama think? His answer was pure professorial evasion:[2] I don't know, and I don't presume to know. What I know is that there is life here on Earth, and that we're not attending to it. He won the presidency, of course. And like so many presidents before and after him, nothing happened on the UFO front. This was, in fact, the moment the Obama White House showed its true colors. UFO enthusiasts—who had hoped the cool, law-review, post-partisan President might be different—were quickly disabused. John Podesta, a Clinton-era chief of staff running Obama's transition, had publicly called for declassifying UFO records. Bill Richardson, governor of New Mexico, had spoken of a "cover-up." The Extraterrestrial Phenomenon Political Action Committee wrote an earnest letter demanding an end to the "six-decade truth embargo." They got exactly nothing. The truth embargo, it turned out, was bipartisan. And Podesta, ever the loyal soldier, shut up about it the moment he got inside the tent. During a March 21, 2012, trip to Roswell, New Mexico, President Obama did what every President before him had done. He joked about aliens in his opening remarks.[3] We had landed in Roswell. I announced to people when I landed that I had come in peace (laughter). Let me tell you, there are more nine- and ten-year-old boys around the country; when I meet them, they ask me, 'Have you been to Roswell, and is it true what they say?' And I tell them, 'If I told you, I would have to kill you.' So, their eyes get all big, so we're going to keep our secrets here. It appeared, for a breathless moment, that Obama had just revealed the secret—that an alien presence was being covered up. The message that the government would keep its Roswell secrets directly contradicted the official Air Force investigations of 1994 and 1997 (no crash, no cover-up). It also contradicted an official statement issued just four months earlier, in November 2011, by the Science Advisor's office to the President.[6] Searching for ET, But No Evidence Yet The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race. In addition, no credible information suggests that anyone is hiding evidence from the public. The Roswell quip did not appear to be part of the official speech text. Either a tongue slip or a planned leak. What made it even more significant is that the President would do the same thing again. And again. A couple of weeks later, in May 2012, Obama made an alien comment while on a tour of the White House with actor Will Smith and his family. A private conversation, yes. But Obama—a man who measured every syllable—would have known the story would get repeated. It did.[4] Jaden Smith, Will's 14-year-old son, wanted to ask President Obama about aliens. Will asked him not to. When the tour arrived in the Situation Room, a 5,000-square-foot basement bunker run by the National Security Council, Jaden prepared to ask his question. Obama, somehow, already knew it was coming. He looked at Jaden and said, "Don't tell me, the aliens, right?" Jaden confirmed. Obama then deployed what intelligence professionals call a Glomar response, the phrase used when you cannot even acknowledge the existence of a classified program. "I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of extraterrestrials," Obama told Jaden. "But I can tell you if there had been a top-secret meeting, it would have taken place in this very room." Speaking of his encounter with the President, Jaden stated,[4] I talked to President Obama about extraterrestrials. He said he could neither confirm nor deny the existence of aliens, which means they're real. If people think we're the only people that live in this universe, then something is wrong with them. Jaden Smith, age fourteen, had just outmaneuvered the leader of the free world on the semantics of Disclosure. The White House press corps did not notice. Obama continued his alien talk during an August 13, 2012, phone call to NASA. He was calling to congratulate the agency on the successful landing of the Curiosity rover on Mars. But instead of simple congratulations, Obama, strangely, as Bill Clinton had almost twenty years earlier, brought up Martians.[5] Someone asked me the other day if we had already found Martians. I told them we have to give you a little bit of time. If you do make contact with Martians, please let me know right away because I've got a lot of other things on my plate, but I suspect that will go to the top of the list, even if they're just microbes. Fortunately for Obama, each comment was delivered with a humorous tone that kept the media asleep. The press corps had long since decided that UFO questions were beneath the dignity of a president. They were wrong, of course. But that didn't matter. Then, at the 2013 Kennedy Center Honors, the President took the joke to a new level. In doing so, he inadvertently made history. The night was meant to celebrate the recipients, including actress and author Shirley MacLaine—a woman famous for her public, outspoken belief in UFOs and extraterrestrial contact. At the podium, Obama addressed the audience and the honoree directly.[7] Now, when you first become President, one of the questions that people ask you is, what's really going on in Area 51? When I wanted to know, I'd call Shirley MacLaine. … I think I just became the first president ever publicly to mention Area 51. How's that, Shirley? Declassified CIA documents had acknowledged the official existence of the Groom Lake facility just months earlier.[8] But Obama was indeed the first sitting president to utter the name "Area 51" in a public speech.[7] His statement about calling MacLaine—clearly a joke—served to officially connect the President of the United States with the world's most famous UFO conspiracy theory in a public forum. The line between official denial and unofficial intrigue had never been blurrier. Obama Denies ET Reality In November 2011, the White House sent a reply through its Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to a petition filed by UFO lobbyist Steven Bassett. The petition asked the government to acknowledge an extraterrestrial presence engaging the human race formally—the so-called Disclosure. The White House reply denied an ET presence on Earth. It also denied that the government had covered anything up.[6] The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race. In addition, no credible information suggests that anyone is hiding evidence from the public. Because this statement ran directly counter to the general opinion of the American people (roughly half of whom, in poll after poll, believe the government is hiding something), I filed seven Freedom of Information Act requests to find out what happened behind the scenes. The results, as expected, were not encouraging. The FOIA documents released by the OSTP—about fifty pages in total—can be summed up by one line written by OSTP public relations officer Phil Larson, the man who actually wrote the White House reply. In an email to David Weaver and Bob Jacobs at NASA, Larson stated:[9] The first FOIA asked what the OSTP had used for research to produce its official government statement that there is "no credible evidence" that ETs have visited Earth. The answer, according to the FOIA, was nothing. They had no documents in the office concerning UFOs or extraterrestrials. Not a single piece of paper.[9] The official conclusion of "no credible evidence" was therefore not supported by any evidence itself, whether credible or not. The Obama White House had become like a student who writes a book report without reading the book. Even more unpardonable: the FOIA revealed that the OSTP did not seek any evidence. The White House's scientific arm was caught rigging the experiment to reach a preordained conclusion. Another FOIA request sought all drafts of the ET petition response—to determine who wrote it, which outside agencies had input, and which words were changed. This kind of draft analysis has worked well in the past. (The famous "alien invasion" remark in Ronald Reagan's 1987 United Nations speech, for example, was pulled by speechwriters and only restored when Reagan himself penned a note to put it back in.) The hope was that this FOIA would provide similar insights. The plan was thwarted by the OSTP FOIA archivists' constant use of the B5 exemption. In short, this exemption says that any internal advice is exempt from release because, if it were not, people would be reluctant to give advice. Page after page was blacked out. None of the four people who appeared to work on the ET reply had their advice or opinions made public. The OSTP simply used the B5 exemption to cover everything that happened behind the scenes. One FOIA sought to determine who tasked Larson with drafting the official ET petition reply. That FOIA produced no name.[9] It failed because Katelyn Sabochik, who runs the "We the People" site on the White House website, assigned the ET petition reply to OSTP. Since she does not work for OSTP, she—and whoever gives her orders—are exempt from the scope of the FOIA. The FOIA documents showed that NASA was the only outside agency OSTP contracted for comment and correction. In previous administrations, the OSTP had contacted the CIA. This time, it did not. At NASA, Bob Jacobs (Deputy Assistant Administrator for Public Affairs) and David Weaver (Associate Administrator for Communications) had been sent a draft of the ET petition response. Both had nothing to add or change. This was no surprise. Neither man is a working scientist with any expertise in UFOs. They are senior administrators specializing in government, politics, media relations, and public policy. When the OSTP went public with its reply, Jacobs retweeted the news on his Twitter page but did not mention his involvement. The most essential document in the FOIA release was the reply to the request asking for all documents showing that President Obama—or someone representing him in the Oval Office—saw the petition that 12,000+ people thought was sent to him. The reply was "no records." According to available OSTP records, Obama never saw the petition.[9] The documents also confirmed that the evidence for a possible ET presence on Earth remains unchallenged. It's not as if the White House did a study and found that UFO researchers are wrong. The White House simply took a lazy political approach. The whole "We the People" petition site was meant to make the American public think the White House cared about their opinions. The answer to the ET petition showed that, in reality, "We the People" is a shallow political marketing effort. Sort of like the appeal you'll hear many times in the next election cycle: your vote counts. The reality is the status quo. The White House is staffed by politicians, political advisors, and politically appointed staff who care about power and keeping their jobs. They take the easy road—on UFOs, on the federal debt, on anything that might cause controversy. They promote the idea of a government of the people, by the people, when in fact it is a game of what to say, what not to say, how to say it, and staying in power by making it sound like you give a damn when you really don't. The White House, its website, and the "We the People" petition site will always take second place to political consultants who know the names of the 13,000 Washington lobbyists and the names of the people who pay up to $35,800 to attend political fundraising dinners. It is about votes. About how to get elected and then re-elected. The 2012 election cost $6–7 billion. That money came from interest groups that protect their interests. They are listened to. Not the people signing petitions on "We the People." The FOIAs to the OSTP on the ET petition have sadly confirmed these truths about how things really are in Washington. Hopefully, no one will be surprised. The final irony: the White House's denial of ET and the cover-up turned the whole petition into a joke of democracy. The "We the People" concept was established so the average citizen could get an answer from the White House on important issues. After the ET petition was addressed, the number of signatures required to get an answer rose to 25,000. Later, a group collected 25,000 signatures calling on the White House to build a "Death Star." At that point, the signature threshold was raised to 100,000. This means the government is answerable to the voters—provided you have 99,999 friends who will sign your petition. Late-Night Revelations and a Presidential Joke The pattern of public humor and private evasion continued into Obama's post-presidency. In March 2015, while still in office, Obama appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live! The host pressed him, as he had with Bill Clinton, about whether he had searched the White House files for the truth. Kimmel admitted that seeking out the Area 51 files would be his first act as President. Obama shut him down with a smirk:[10] That's why you will not be President. The aliens won't let it happen. ... They exercise strict control over us. When Kimmel recounted that Clinton had looked and reported there was nothing, Obama replied with a loaded smirk:[10] That's what we're expected to say. The dance continued in 2016 on The Ellen DeGeneres Show. Ellen brought out six-year-old "presidential expert" Macey Hensley, who asked the President about the legendary "Book of Secrets." She theorized the secrets could include whether "aliens are real." [11] "That's a secret," the President quipped. Macey pressed further. Obama finally gave her a direct, if careful, answer:[11] We haven't actually made direct contact with aliens yet. When we do, I'll let you know. In 2017, Obama played golf with pro Jordan Spieth. According to Spieth, Obama walked up to a putt, casually mentioned that, as President, he had seen the aliens, and then added: "They're freaking crazy looking." He sank the putt, winked, and walked off. Spieth told the story to Golf Digest.[14] It was pure Obama: a joke so deadpan that no one could quite tell if it was a joke at all. In 2020, after leaving office, Obama appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. When Colbert asked if he had ever received briefings about aliens and UFOs, Obama gave his most classic Glomar response yet.[12] "Certainly, asked about it," said Obama. "And?" pressed Colbert. "Can't tell you," replied Obama, with an impish grin. "Sorry." Colbert took this non-answer as confirmation. "All right, I'll take that as a 'yes,' because if there were none, you'd say there was none." Obama, playing into the charade, did nothing to discourage him. "Feel free to think that," the former President said.[12] Finally, in 2021, Obama appeared on The Late Show with James Corden. The question came not from the host but from bandleader Reggie Watts, who asked about "dem aliens" and "UAFs." With a laugh, Obama revealed just how persistent his own curiosity had been.[13] When it comes to the aliens, there are some things I just can't tell you on-air. ... I asked, right? I was like, 'All right, is there a lab somewhere where we're keeping the alien specimens and spaceship?' And you know, they did a little bit of research, and the answer was no. Then he added a serious note—confirming the reality of unexplained phenomena:[13] What is true, and I'm actually being serious here, is that there are footage and records of objects in the skies that we don't know exactly what they are. We can't explain how they moved or their trajectory. They did not have an easily explainable pattern. With that, he summed up the entire Obama-era paradox on UFOs: a president who publicly jokes and evades, yet privately asks the same questions as everyone else, confirming the mystery while denying the answer. The pattern remained consistent long after he left the Oval Office. After leaving the White House, Barack and Michelle Obama continued their fascination with the unknown through their production company, Higher Ground Productions. The company, which they run for Netflix, quietly began developing a film project based on one of the most famous UFO abduction stories in American history: the case of Betty and Barney Hill.[15] The Hills claimed they were abducted by aliens while driving through New Hampshire's White Mountains in September 1961. They were experimented on, becoming the first widely publicized supposed abduction in the United States. The film, reportedly titled White Mountains, would adapt their account. As one UFC fighter and relative of Barney Hill put it, "If you're gonna do a story about the first black man to be abducted by aliens, get the black side of the family to talk about it." [15] Then, in February 2026, the former President stepped directly into the firestorm. Appearing on the podcast No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen, Obama was asked during a lightning round a question that had followed him for nearly two decades: "Are aliens real?" His answer was immediate and direct.[16] They're real, but I haven't seen them," Obama replied, adding, "And they're not being kept in… what is it? Area 51. There's no underground facility unless there's this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the President of the United States. The viral clip exploded across the internet. Headlines worldwide declared that a former president had just confirmed the existence of extraterrestrials. Within hours, the 44th president was forced to walk back his statement. On Instagram, he posted a clarification alongside the clip.[16] I was trying to stick with the spirit of the speed round, but since it's gotten attention, let me clarify. Statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there's life out there. But the distances between solar systems are so great that the chances aliens have visited us are low, and I saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us. Really! The clarification did little to stop the political fallout. On February 19, 2026, aboard Air Force One, President Donald Trump was asked about Obama's remarks. His response was swift and explosive. Trump accused his predecessor of leaking classified information—an unprecedented charge by one President against another.[17] "He gave classified information. He's not supposed to be doing that," Trump told reporters. "He made a big mistake. He took it out of classified information." When asked if he himself believed aliens were real, Trump demurred, saying, "I don't know if they're real or not." But then he added a remarkable promise: "I may get him out of trouble by declassifying." Hours later, Trump took to his Truth Social platform and issued a formal directive to the federal government.[17] Based on the tremendous interest shown, I will be directing the Secretary of War, and other relevant Departments and Agencies, to begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters. The order targeted the Department of War and other agencies. In the days that followed, the Department of War confirmed it was complying with the President's directive. NASA, for its part, stated a spokeswoman reaffirming its commitment to open science. But one of its senior scientists, Dr. Gentry Lee—a veteran of the agency since 1968—was characteristically dismissive: "There is nothing to indicate that any aliens or alien ships have ever landed on planet Earth. If you think otherwise, you are misinformed." The political clash between a sitting president and his predecessor over the existence of extraterrestrials was unprecedented. Obama had been forced to clarify his remarks. Trump had used them to launch a declassification order. The intelligence agencies of the United States were now formally reviewing their secret files on UFOs. Two months later, nothing had yet occurred. The full story of what President Trump's order ultimately revealed—and the consequences of the clash between the 44th and 45th presidents—continues in the Trump chapter. Endnotes for the Obama UFO Chapter [1] Remarks by the President at the National Archives, May 21, 2009. National Archives and Records Administration. (Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov) [2] "Transcript: the Democratic debate." October 30, 2007. NBC News. (Source: nbcnews.com) [3] Shear, Michael D. "Obama, in Roswell, Says 'I Come in Peace.'" March 21, 2012. The Caucus blog, The New York Times. (Source: thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com) [4] Mikelbank, Peter. "Will Smith's Son Asked Obama About Aliens." May 16, 2012. People. (Source: people.com) / "Will Smith Embarrassed By Son's Alien Question To Barack Obama." May 16, 2012. HuffPost. (Source: huffpost.com) [5] "President Obama Calls NASA's Curiosity Team." August 13, 2012. NASA TV. (Source: nasa.gov) [6] "Searching for ET, But No Evidence Yet." November 7, 2011. Office of Science and Technology Policy, The White House. (Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov) / Larson, Phil. "The fact is we have no credible evidence of extraterrestrial presence here on Earth." Email exchange with NASA officials. Released via FOIA. [7] "Remarks by the President at the Kennedy Center Honors." December 8, 2013. The White House Office of the Press Secretary. (Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov) [8] Central Intelligence Agency. "The CIA and the U-2 Program, 1954-1974." August 2013. Declassified FOIA document. (Source: cia.gov) [9] Greenewald, John. The Black Vault. FOIA Case F-2012-01407, Obama Presidential Library. (Source: theblackvault.com) [10] "President Obama Chats With Jimmy Kimmel." March 12, 2015. Jimmy Kimmel Live! ABC. (Source: youtube.com/watch?v=Khk8R8X0xLg) [11] "President Obama Answers a 6-Year-Old's Question About Aliens." February 12, 2016. The Ellen DeGeneres Show. (Source: ellentube.com) [12] "Barack Obama On UFOs: 'I Certainly Asked About It.'" December 1, 2020. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. CBS. (Source: youtube.com/watch?v=5qohtIfpAZM) [13] "Obama Jokes That First Question He Asked as President Concerned Aliens." May 18, 2021. People. (Source: people.com) [14] "Jordan Spieth reveals how Barack Obama used trash talk and aliens to win their recent match." October 27, 2017. Golf Digest. (Source: golfdigest.com) [15] "Netflix Eyes' White Mountains' Movie Adaptation from Higher Ground Productions." December 15, 2022. What's on Netflix? (Source: whats-on-netflix.com) [16] Cohen, Brian Tyler. "Obama on Aliens, the Future of the Democratic Party, & His Marriage Advice." February 14, 2026. No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (Podcast). (Source: youtube.com/watch?v=0Af__t6o96A) / Obama, Barack (@barackobama). Instagram post. February 15, 2026. (Source: instagram.com) [17] Samuels, Brett. "Trump says 'Obama gave classified information' by saying aliens are real.'" February 19, 2026. The Hill. (Source: thehill.com) / Shear, Michael D. "Trump Orders Release of Government Files on Aliens and UFOs." February 19, 2026. The New York Times. (Source: nytimes.com) -- Website presidentialufo.org Podcast https://open.spotify.com/show/2iZhuwub4reWIYAaiiNIwo

DOLLY PARTON
The Receptive Songwriter
Dolly Parton provides one of the clearest documented models of the receptive songwriter. Her creative output was vast, numbering in the thousands of songs, but that scale is only part of the story. What makes Parton particularly important to the question of inspiration is how she described the process and organized her life around it. Songs did not always arrive because she sat down at a desk and decided to manufacture one. They could come in dreams, in the early morning, during periods of solitude, while traveling, while remembering something from childhood, or while sitting among graves. Parton responded by keeping pens, pads, and recording devices close by because an idea might appear suddenly and disappear just as quickly. That behavior reveals something basic about how she understood songwriting. She was a highly experienced craftsman, but she also treated inspiration as something she had to be ready to receive. The raw material came from everywhere. Parton grew up in the Great Smoky Mountains of East Tennessee in a large family with very little money, surrounded by music, storytelling, religion, and mountain folklore. Her songs repeatedly drew from that world. Poverty, family, childhood embarrassment, relationships, strangers, old stories, and unusual people all became material. She did not have to reproduce an event exactly as it happened. She could take one detail from real life, combine it with another unrelated detail, and create an emotional situation more powerful than either source alone. “Jolene” is one of the clearest examples. The name came from a young girl Parton met after a performance, while the emotional tension came from a bank teller who had shown too much interest in Parton’s husband. The child and the bank teller had nothing to do with each other, but Parton brought the two elements together and created a song that sounded as though it had emerged from one complete experience. “Coat of Many Colors” worked differently because the source was autobiographical. Parton’s mother had made her a coat from scraps of fabric and told her the biblical story of Joseph and his coat of many colors. Dolly went to school proud of the garment, but children ridiculed her, seeing poverty where she saw love. Years later, while traveling on Porter Wagoner’s tour bus, the memory began organizing itself into a song. She had no normal writing paper available, so she wrote the lyrics on the back of a dry-cleaning receipt. The story illustrates the practical side of the receptive process. When the material began to move, Parton did not wait for the right room, the right desk, or the right piece of paper. She captured it immediately. The emotional transformation involved in “Coat of Many Colors” was just as important as the unusual circumstances of its writing. Parton has described songwriting as a way of processing emotional experiences, and this song turned a painful childhood memory into something very different. The ridicule remained part of the story, but it was no longer the event's controlling meaning. The finished song placed her mother’s love at the center. Parton took an experience that once represented humiliation and turned it into one of the strongest statements of dignity in her catalog. Songwriting therefore served as both storytelling and emotional release. This ability to transform experience helps explain why Parton could write so much. She was not limited to recording events exactly as they happened. She could imagine herself in another person's life and write from that position. A child in a cemetery could become the source of a tragic song. A stranger’s name could become one of the most famous women in country music. A clairvoyant mountain woman could become the center of “These Old Bones.” Parton had a remarkable ability to recognize the emotional core inside an image, memory, or person and then build the larger story around it. The creative period that produced “Jolene” and “I Will Always Love You” demonstrates just how concentrated this process could become. The familiar story is that the two songs were written on the same day. Parton herself has been more careful. What is documented is that the songs appeared back-to-back on the same old cassette recording, and Parton has said they may have been written on the same day. The exact timing matters less than the density of the creative event. Two songs with completely different emotional purposes emerged during the same remarkable writing period. “Jolene” was built around insecurity and fear of losing a relationship. “I Will Always Love You” was a farewell to Porter Wagoner as Parton prepared to leave their professional partnership. One looked toward the possibility of loss; the other accepted separation. Both became standards. Parton could not rely on conventional notation in the way a formally trained composer might. She played by ear and carried melodies in her head. This made immediate capture especially important. If a melody appeared, she needed to preserve the sound rather than simply write it down on a staff. Tape recorders therefore became part of the process, particularly near the bed. She has described waking with music or ideas in her head and recording them before they disappeared. The recorder was not a gimmick. It was a practical response to the fact that she did not completely control when ideas arrived. Her preference for the very early morning developed out of the same attitude. Parton routinely described getting up around two or three o’clock, before the day's ordinary demands began. She called the insights associated with those hours her “wee hour wisdom.” The time was valuable because the world was quiet and there were fewer distractions, but Parton also connected those hours with prayer and spiritual reflection. Songwriting, meditation, planning, and communication with God occupied the same protected part of the day. She did not separate creative work from spiritual practice. They overlapped. Figure 1: The flow chart of the Parton song output. Dreams occupied another part of that receptive territory. Parton has repeatedly described ideas arriving while asleep or immediately upon waking, and one of the clearest examples is “Don’t Make Me Have to Come Down There.” She said the song began with a vivid dream in which she saw God looking down on humanity and heard the phrase that became the title. She woke with the central idea intact and began developing it into a song. The complete composition was not necessarily presented to her in finished form, but the image, message, and title emerged from the dream state and guided the piece. The same pattern appears in “These Old Bones.” Parton has said that the title came to her in a dream. She then developed a story about an elderly mountain woman with unusual intuitive or clairvoyant abilities. The character was not created in isolation from Parton’s background. She grew up around stories of people in the mountains believed to possess such gifts, and she later said members of her own family had what she called a clairvoyant ability. She added that she believed she possessed it herself “to a degree.” The dream supplied the beginning, while childhood memory and Appalachian tradition supplied the world into which the story could grow. The importance of Appalachian culture in Parton’s writing cannot be overstated. Christianity was central to her upbringing, but mountain culture also preserved stories of dreams, omens, healings, intuitions, ghosts, and people believed to know what they should not have known. These beliefs did not necessarily stand outside religion. They were part of the same cultural environment. A person could go to church on Sunday and also believe that a dream carried a warning or that someone in the family had unusual intuitive ability. Parton’s later songwriting reflects that mixture naturally rather than as something adopted for dramatic effect. Her graveyard practice belongs directly inside this world. Parton has spoken openly about spending time in cemeteries to think and write. She did not treat them merely as macabre places. She described them as peaceful places where her imagination came alive. She read names and dates and began wondering about the people beneath the stones, what their lives had been like, what they had loved, and what had happened between the two dates carved into the marker. In one of her clearest descriptions of the practice, Parton said, “I just sit in the graveyard and feel the energies, the lives, and the memories.” (Bustle) That statement adds something important to the story because Parton was not simply using the cemetery as a quiet outdoor office. The setting itself mattered. The people were gone, but their names, relationships, and emotional traces remained. Parton let those fragments spark stories. She began doing this when she was young and continued the practice later in life. The cemetery provided silence, but it also provided a direct confrontation with lives that had ended and stories that could no longer be told by the people who had lived them. “Jeannie’s Afraid of the Dark” grew partly out of this kind of observation. Parton connected the song with the image of a child’s grave associated with an eternal flame. The image stayed in her imagination and became a song in which a child’s fear of darkness extends beyond death. The story is characteristic of Parton because the external trigger is small. A grave, a light, and a name can become the foundation for an entire emotional narrative. Parton sometimes described the quiet place she was trying to reach in spiritual terms, describing the need to withdraw from the noise of ordinary activity so she could become receptive. Prayer, solitude, and fasting became part of this effort. These practices were particularly visible during concentrated writing retreats. When working on Hungry Again, Parton returned to Tennessee, withdrew from much of her normal public life, and fasted while writing. She produced dozens of songs during the broader retreat period. The fasting was not presented simply as a diet. Parton associated it with humility, discipline, spiritual grounding, and reconnecting with herself. This is important because Parton did not wait passively for inspiration. She actively created conditions that she believed made inspiration easier to hear. She removed distractions. She prayed. She got up before other people. She spent time alone. She fasted. She visited graveyards. She kept recording equipment nearby. The process was receptive, but it was also disciplined. She did not control the arrival of the idea, but she controlled whether she was ready when it appeared. The pattern can be summarized without becoming a rigid formula. Creative Stage Parton’s Process Typical Sources and Examples Raw Material Memory, observation, relationships, Appalachian culture and emotional experience Childhood poverty, family stories, Porter Wagoner, Carl Dean, strangers and mountain characters Receptive State Creating quiet conditions in which ideas could surface Early morning, prayer, solitude, fasting, dreams and graveyards Initial Trigger A word, image, person, memory, or dream begins the process “Jolene,” the coat made by her mother, a gravestone, “These Old Bones,” the dream behind “Don’t Make Me Have to Come Down There” Capture Preserving the idea before it disappears Tape recorder, notebook, scraps of paper, receipts, guitar or voice Development Turning the original spark into a structured song Melody, narrative, character, rhyme, and emotional point of view Stewardship Protecting and preserving what she created Publishing control, songs described as children, unreleased material preserved for the future The final category becomes particularly important in Parton’s case because she repeatedly described songs as her children. That metaphor says more than she simply loved her work. It also helps explain how she protected it. The most famous example involved Elvis Presley and “I Will Always Love You.” Parton desperately wanted Presley to record the song, but Colonel Tom Parker expected her to surrender a major share of the publishing. She refused. The decision cost her the Elvis recording and upset her deeply, but she retained ownership. Years later Whitney Houston recorded the song and turned it into an international phenomenon. The decision is often described as evidence of Parton’s business intelligence, which it certainly was, but her own language gives it another dimension. If songs were her children, then they were not simply commodities produced for sale. She believed they had been entrusted to her. She could license them, perform them, and allow others to interpret them, but she remained responsible for what happened to them. Her refusal to give away “I Will Always Love You” fits this larger pattern of creative stewardship. One of the strangest extensions of that idea is the song Parton deliberately removed from circulation and sent into the future. In 2015, she recorded a song called “My Place in History” and placed it in a time capsule at Dollywood’s DreamMore Resort. The song is not supposed to be released until 2046, on what would have been her one-hundredth birthday. Parton later admitted that the arrangement bothered her because she thought the song was good and wanted people to hear it. She compared sealing it away to burying one of her children. (The Washington Post) The time-capsule song is unusually appropriate to Parton’s philosophy. A song could be created in one period and deliberately sent forward to people the songwriter might never meet. The writer does not control who will eventually hear it or what it will mean to them. Parton completed the creative act, recorded the result, and then surrendered the song to time. This also helps explain why she guarded her compositions so carefully. A song might begin with an event that belonged only to Dolly Parton, but after release it became part of other people’s lives. “Coat of Many Colors” could remind someone of childhood poverty completely unrelated to the Parton family. “I Will Always Love You” could become a farewell between people who had never heard of Porter Wagoner. “Jolene” could be interpreted across generations and musical styles. The song began in one person’s experience but did not remain there. Parton’s songwriting therefore operated at the intersection of observation, craft and receptivity. She drew heavily from the physical world around her. Yet, she consistently made room for material that arrived from less deliberate states: dreams, intuition, memory, silence and the strange associative processes that occur when ordinary distractions are reduced. Like many top musicians, she could not read or write music. She played by ear rather than relying heavily on formal notation, which meant that much of the creative structure had to remain alive internally until it could be recorded or played. The physical tools around her—guitar, recorder, notebook, receipt—became bridges between the fleeting internal event and the permanent song. The spiritual component tied the process together. Parton did not separate her songwriting identity from her relationship with God. Prayer, gratitude, and the belief that talent was a gift ran throughout her career. “The Seeker,” one of the songs she identified with most, expresses that relationship as an ongoing search rather than a declaration that she had all the answers. The writer asks for direction and continues listening. That closely mirrors the position Parton adopted toward creativity itself. This makes her different from an artist who describes composition purely as technical construction. Parton clearly understood technique. Thousands of songs do not emerge from talent alone. She knew narrative pacing, emotional economy, rhyme, melodic structure, and how to create a character with only a few lines. At the same time, her personal habits show that she believed there was a stage of the process that could not simply be commanded. She made herself available to it. The graveyard is probably the best single image of the process. Parton could sit quietly among people she had never known, read their names and dates, feel what she called their “energies, the lives, and the memories,” and begin imagining stories no longer available to her. The same receptivity appeared when she woke from a dream, when a childhood memory surfaced on a tour bus, when a young fan gave her a name she could not forget, or when she isolated herself in Tennessee to write. Dolly Parton’s creative life, then, was not built around one mysterious event. It was a sustained practice lasting decades. She accumulated material continuously and stayed attentive to the moment it began turning into something else. Sometimes the source was obvious. Sometimes it came from a dream. Sometimes it emerged in a cemetery. Sometimes two major songs appeared almost on top of one another. Parton didn't need all those experiences to explain the same thing. She simply developed a way of working that allowed each of them to become music. That may be the most useful way to understand her as a receptive songwriter. The gift was not passivity. It required preparation, attention, and work. Parton listened closely to her own memories and to the people around her. She protected silence. She recorded dreams. She prayed. She withdrew when necessary. She wrote on whatever was available. She preserved ownership of the songs once they were finished, and in one extraordinary case she sealed one away for an audience decades in the future. Her career demonstrates how a songwriter can be both an exceptional craftsman and someone who experiences inspiration as arrival. The craft explains what Parton could do with an idea once she had it. Her lifelong habits show how seriously she took the question of being present when the idea appeared.


UFO Disclosure Timeline
TIMELINE OF DISCLOSURE
(The Search for Truth — Government Secrets, Whistleblowers & Consciousness)
1940s: The Beginning
-
1947 – Roswell Incident: First major modern UFO crash narrative. U.S. Army initially claims recovery of a “flying disc,” later retracted.
-
1947 – Kenneth Arnold Sighting: Coins the term "flying saucer." Sparks the post-war UFO craze.
-
1948 – Project Sign begins: First U.S. Air Force investigation into UFOs.
1950s: Government Secrecy Takes Hold
-
1952 – Washington D.C. UFO Flap: Multiple UFOs tracked over U.S. Capitol on radar. Scrambled jets can’t intercept them.
-
1953 – Robertson Panel: CIA recommends UFOs be publicly debunked to prevent “mass hysteria.”
-
1954 – Eisenhower’s Alleged ET Meeting: Rumors persist of secret meetings with extraterrestrials at Edwards AFB.
1960s: Contact & Conflict
-
1961 – Betty & Barney Hill Abduction: First widely publicized alien abduction. Begins the “contactee” wave.
-
1967 – Malmstrom AFB Incident: Nuclear missiles go offline as UFOs hover nearby — key case for nukes + UFOs.
1970s: Leaks & Legends
-
1971 – Presidential UFO Briefing: Alleged top-secret film shown to government officials at Holloman AFB.
-
1974 – Grant Cameron’s Initial Sighting (Charlie Red Star, Manitoba): Launches his lifelong research journey.
-
1977 – Jimmy Carter Pledge: Claims UFO sighting and promises disclosure — later walks it back.
1980s: Psyops, MJ-12 & Cattle Mutilations
-
1980 – Rendlesham Forest Incident (UK): Military witnesses a landed craft, symbols, and strange light beams.
-
1984 – MJ-12 Documents "Leaked”: Controversial documents surface claiming a secret government UFO committee.
-
1989 – Bob Lazar Goes Public: Claims to have worked at S-4 reverse-engineering alien craft.
1990s: Disinformation vs. Disclosure
-
1993 – Rockefeller Initiative Begins: Billionaire Laurence Rockefeller pushes the Clinton White House for UFO disclosure.
-
1995 – Alien Autopsy Video Released: Later exposed as a hoax, but further fuels interest and suspicion.
-
1997 – Phoenix Lights: One of the largest mass UFO sightings in U.S. history.
2000s: Leaks & Leverage
-
2001 – Disclosure Project Press Conference (Steven Greer): Over 20 military and government witnesses testify at the National Press Club.
-
2004 – USS Nimitz / Tic Tac Encounter: Navy pilots intercept and film a UAP — becomes key in modern disclosure narrative.
2010s: The Shift
-
2017 – New York Times Bombshell: Luis Elizondo goes public about AATIP (Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program). Pentagon confirms program’s existence.
-
2017 – To The Stars Academy formed: Elizondo, Tom DeLonge, Chris Mellon push disclosure into mainstream media.
-
2019 – Navy Confirms UAP Videos Are Real: First official U.S. government acknowledgment of unknown aerial craft.
2020s: Controlled Disclosure or Psyop?
-
2020 – UAP Task Force Created: Government formalizes its UAP investigations.
-
2021 – Preliminary UAP Report Released: 144 incidents, 143 unexplained. Admits national security concern.
-
2022 – New Whistleblowers Emerge: Insider testimony to Congress behind closed doors.
-
2023 – David Grusch Testimony: Claims recovered craft and “non-human biologics” in U.S. possession — but refuses to name witnesses or provide documents publicly.
-
2024 – Push for More Hearings & FOIA Releases: Congress battles for transparency. Grusch, Elizondo, and others remain central.
-
2025 – Disclosure or Distraction? More mainstream coverage, yet many suspect religious factions and intelligence psyops behind the scenes (per Grant’s recent research).
Skinwalker Ranch
Beneath the Skin: The Unrelenting Strangeness of Skinwalker Ranch
Where the Veil Isn’t Thin — It’s Torn
There are places on this planet where reality fractures. Where things slip through. Where logic breaks down and the human mind, no matter how rational or trained, buckles under the weight of what it sees. Skinwalker Ranch is not just one of those places — it may be the place.
This is not about the usual tales. Not the history, not the lore you've heard repeated. This is about what still crawls, floats, hunts, and watches in the high desert of Utah. These are the unsettling fragments — the bizarre, the grotesque, and the utterly unexplained. No conclusions. No closure. Just evidence of something "other" clawing at the edges of our reality.
• Portals and Predators
Ranch hands reported seeing holes open midair — not optical illusions, but rippling, circular voids with views into alternate landscapes. One veteran saw a “humanoid” crawl out of one, upright, and sprint into the night. The hole sealed behind it.
• The Silent Watchers
Black humanoid figures — tall, featureless, and soundless — appear on ridgelines. They never approach. They only watch. Dogs growl, electronics fail, and a cold dread spreads whenever they appear.
• Phantom Wolves That Don’t Die
One creature, resembling a prehistoric dire wolf, was shot multiple times at close range while attacking livestock. It did not bleed. It did not flinch. It simply turned and walked away, vanishing into thin air.
• Muted Cattle Mutilations
Livestock found with organs removed — no blood, no signs of struggle, surgical precision. One cow was seen alive by camera just minutes before being discovered dead and dissected, with no signs of human or animal interference. Even scavengers refuse to touch the remains.
• Invisible Force Fields
Researchers walking the property have been physically knocked to the ground by unseen forces. One man described a “wall” of pressure that paralyzed him. Others report feeling as if their brains were being scanned or probed.
• Minds That Unravel
Investigators have left the ranch with sudden, severe psychological disturbances: paranoia, depression, hallucinations — and in some cases, complete personality shifts. These episodes sometimes follow them home.
• Glowing Orbs That Chase
Brilliant blue orbs with an apparent intelligence have been seen stalking people and animals. One instance ended with a group of dogs chasing an orb into the brush — and never returning. When found later, their remains were incinerated, fused to the soil.
• Mechanical Interference and Surveillance
Every technical setup — no matter how advanced — eventually fails. Cameras stop recording at crucial moments. Footage is wiped. Batteries drain instantly. Drones vanish mid-flight. And sometimes, footage plays back things that weren’t seen at the time.
Something Is Playing With Us
Skinwalker Ranch isn't haunted. It isn't even cursed. It’s something worse. It's interactive. Reactive. It probes, it mimics, it escalates. It knows fear and feeds on it. Something ancient or interdimensional — or both — is staging a silent war for observation, control, and perhaps something deeper: the manipulation of belief, perception, and soul.
This is not just high strangeness.
It’s a theatre of the impossible.
And the performance never ends.


